Comments for Tek Trek

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by Saving time checklists « Rattle and Hum

Saving time checklists « Rattle and Hum — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:12:20 +0000

[...] in saving time when selecting online tools for class, look no further than Tektrekker’s Web 2.0 Selection Criteria. He has identified his criteria as access, usability, privacy and intellectual property, workload [...]

Comment on Get Involved! Present at Sloan-C Carefree by megan fox

megan fox — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:52:20 +0000

Sign: umsun Hello!!! rcuwwymhyw and 4930ssgfhphzye and 2822I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz its really helpful.

Comment on Get Involved! Present at Sloan-C Carefree by sandrar

sandrar — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:21:25 +0000

Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. Cheers! Sandra. R.

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by tektrekker

tektrekker — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:26:50 +0000

Nellie – you’re welcome. I’m so glad you found it helpful. Keep me posted on how you use it – I love hearing how educators apply things.

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by Nellie Deutsch

Nellie Deutsch — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:42:29 +0000

This is absolutely great! Thank you for sharing.

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by tektrekker

tektrekker — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:20:34 +0000

I LOVE what you’ve done with this! You made it so friendly. And, I was excited to learn about a new tech in the process. I have a lot of teacher friends who will enjoy this. Thanks so much.

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by tektrekker

tektrekker — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:17:40 +0000

That’s a great thought. I think I was assuming outputs as part of objectives; however, now that you’ve mentioned it, I think I’m going to rethink that assumption a bit. Do you have suggestions for changes?

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by James

James — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:31:08 +0000

A good list. Do you think the ability to evaluate outputs should be in it, or do you factor that into your objectives and it’s simply a given?

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by Clive Portman

Clive Portman — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:06:41 +0000

I really like your five criteria and have started using them myself on my own site, here:
http://mrportman.co.uk/index.php/friendly_fire/tposts/glypho/

Comment on Web 2.0 Selection Criteria by Web 2.0 selection criteria | Tony Bates

Web 2.0 selection criteria | Tony Bates — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:27:34 +0000

[...] B. (2009) Web 2.0 selection criteria Tek Trek March [...]